Compliance & Regulatory

MIPS Performance Threshold 2026: Are You on Track for the 75-Point Bar?

By the Vizier Editorial Team  ·  May 5, 2026  ·  7 min read

The 2026 MIPS performance threshold is 75 points. Most practices that miss it miss it by 4 or fewer. The four levers that bridge the gap.

The 2026 MIPS performance threshold is 75 points. Among practices that miss the threshold, the median miss is 4 points or fewer. Most are recoverable with focused intervention — but only if the intervention happens before October. Four levers bridge a 71-to-75 gap with the time still available at mid-year.

Lever 1: One additional quality measure outcome

Adding or strengthening one outcome measure typically gains 3-6 points in the quality category. The candidate measures depend on your specialty and panel, but commonly:

  • NQF 0018 Controlling High Blood Pressure (high-priority outcome).
  • NQF 0059 Diabetes A1C Poor Control (high-priority outcome).
  • NQF 0421 BMI Screening with Follow-Up.

Verify the measure exists in the 2026 set (see what changed) and that you have denominator volume.

Lever 2: Promoting Interoperability category completion

PI requires hitting all required measures. A single missed measure floors the category. Common gaps:

  • SAFER Guides attestation (new for 2026).
  • Direct Messaging numerator below threshold.
  • Public health registry transmission failure.

Closing PI gaps from zero can add 15-25 points to the composite. This is the largest single lever for most practices that are under-threshold.

Lever 3: Improvement Activities documentation

IA points require attestation with documented evidence. Some practices commit to activities they don't document. Surveying which IAs the practice can legitimately attest to — and committing to the documentation in time — typically adds 5-10 IA points.

Lever 4: Cost outlier intervention

Cost is the harder lever because intervention takes time to flow through claims data. By mid-year, identifying the top 10% MSPB outliers and targeting care management resources at them can move the Cost rate enough to gain 2-4 composite points. After Q3, the time-to-impact closes.

The math on bridging

For a practice at 71 points in June:

  • Lever 1: +4 points → 75.
  • Or: Lever 2 (PI fix) + Lever 3 (IA doc) → +8 points → 79.
  • Or: All four levers operating → 80-85 points, potentially crossing into exceptional performance.

What to do this week

  1. Pull your category-level scores from QPP or your analytics platform.
  2. Identify the largest gap.
  3. Pick the lever with the highest point yield given the gap type.
  4. Set a 30-day intervention plan with specific accountabilities.
  5. Re-measure in July.

The pattern that wins

Practices that consistently clear 75 don't do it through one heroic measure. They run the four levers above continuously and surface gaps in May rather than November. The math always works; the timing decides whether the math has room to work.

Related on Vizier

See Vizier with your data.

Direct EHR connectors. Plain-English queries. BAA in 1 business day. Bring an export or wire up a connector — answer in 60 seconds.

Request a Demo →See EHR Connectors